There are two types of causation in the law: cause-in-fact, and proximate (or legal) cause. To prove negligence in court, the plaintiff needs to show the other party’s breach of duty was both the actual and proximate cause of their injuries. proximate cause definition: something that is considered to be the direct cause of damage, loss, or injury: . To get to the bottom of whether or not a defendant was negligent, a lawyer must prove they were responsible for the proximate cause. Breach: The defendant breached their duty by failing to use reasonable care, such as yielding or stopping at a stoplight. AZ In a negligence case, there must be a relatively close connection between the defendant’s breach of duty and the injury. There is proximate cause if your injuries were foreseeable. In other words, the defendant should have reasonably anticipated that his or her conduct could result in your injuries. A minority of jurisdictions have ruled ACC clauses to be unenforceable as against public policy, but they are generally enforceable in the majority of jurisdictions. The risk that made the conduct negligent was the risk of the child accidentally firing the gun; the harm suffered could just as easily have resulted from handing the child an unloaded gun. Proximate cause is sometimes difficult for students to grasp. To prove negligence, a lawyer must establish the four elements of tort law. Jill would not have hit Lisa but for Tim’s actions, so Tim is liable for Lisa’s injuries as well. When it is used, it is used to consider the class of people injured, not the type of harm. Definition of proximate cause in the Definitions.net dictionary. This gives a misconception to the name, as if the cause was near as opposed to, the actual one. Proximate cause is used in civil and criminal cases, and are frequent in … Chapter 6 of the Restatement is titled "Scope of Liability (Proximate Cause)." In their intoxicated state, the driver swerves and sideswipes the car. For example, a pedestrian, as an expected user of sidewalks, is among the class of people put at risk by driving on a sidewalk, whereas a driver who is distracted by another driver driving on the sidewalk, and consequently crashes into a utility pole, is not. The most common test of proximate cause under the American legal system is foreseeability. The term proximate has long been known to mean near, or in the vicinity of, not actual. [16], Therefore, in the final version of the Restatement (Third), Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm, published in 2010, the American Law Institute argued that proximate cause should be replaced with scope of liability. Therefore, if they were hurt by it, the proximate cause would be negligible. [18], For the notion of proximate cause in other disciplines, see, event deemed by law to be the effective cause of an injury, In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. Ltd., 3 K.B. Under Arizona law, a remote or trivial factor in causing harm is an element so disconnected that it likely did not contribute to the cause of the accident. It begins with a special note explaining the Institute's decision to reframe the concept in terms of "scope of liability" because it does not involve true causation, and to also include "proximate cause" in the chapter title in parentheses to help judges and lawyers understand the connection between the old and new terminology. Proximate cause is the primary cause of an injury. How to use proximate in a sentence. (For example, but for running the red light, the collisionwould not have occurred.) Proximate cause is an important element in negligence lawsuits, but it can also be a requirement in other types of legal actions, like getting restitution under federal law. Close and Near: The plaintiff sustained an injury in an environment that was both close and near to the defendant’s actions. The fire gets out of control and burns down other homes including yours. Actual cause, also known as cause in fact, is straightforward. Here, the “but for” rule does not apply—if the truck driving north didn’t run the red light, the driver still would have been hit by the motorcycle going south. Their behaviors can be considered substantial factors in causing the plaintiff’s injury. But proximate cause is still met if a thrown baseball misses the target and knocks a heavy object off a shelf behind them, which causes a blunt-force injury. In law, a proximate cause is an event sufficiently related to an injury that the courts deem the event to be the cause of that injury. Proximate cause means legal cause, or one that the law recognizes as the primary cause of the injury. For example, if you walk in an area with a wet floor sign, you place yourself at risk of slipping. However, there is a difference between the actual cause and proximate cause of the injury. See 'But for' test, Negligence, 'Substantial factor' test. A related doctrine is the insurance law doctrine of efficient proximate cause. For instance, if you were to throw a feather at a friend, you could foresee that action not causing injury. "When defendants move for a determination that plaintiff’s harm is beyond the scope of liability as a matter of law, courts must initially consider all of the range of harms risked by the defendant’s conduct that the jury could find as the basis for determining that conduct tortious. Consider a driver who is heading west in their vehicle. If the injury suffered is not the result of one of those risks, there can be no recovery. Courts have determined that if the accident would not have occurred “but for” the wrongdoer’s conduct, that conduct is the legal cause of a victim’s injuries. In complicated cases such as these, the court turns to substantial factors to determine proximate cause. Map & Directions [+]. Cause-in-fact is determined by the "but for" test: But for the action, the result would not have happened. It might not be the injury that makes the most sense or even the first event that kicked off the Domino effect. The Plaintiff’s Actions: If the plaintiff placed themselves at risk of being harmed, the validity of their claim can be brought into question. Generally, proximate cause refers to actions that are reasonably foreseeable to lead to the injuries suffered by a plaintiff. It refers to how foreseeable an injury was as a direct or indirect result of another person’s actions. Therefore, if they were hurt by it, the proximate cause would be negligible. If you fail to yield at a stop sign, you cannot fully blame another driver for hitting you. 414 East Southern Ave. Duty: The defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care to act reasonably, such as safely operating a vehicle. The HWR test is no longer much used, outside of New York law. The harm within the risk (HWR) test determines whether the victim was among the class of persons who could foreseeably be harmed, and whether the harm was foreseeable within the class of risks. A defendant’s liability is proven if a reasonable person could foresee that their actions could cause harm. case or situation. It is the strictest test of causation, made famous by Benjamin Cardozo in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. case under New York state law.[8]. Direct causation is a minority test, which addresses only the metaphysical concept of causation. If a fender-bender happens in the southbound lane, the distracted driver cannot be found liable because their actions didn’t contribute to the accident. Under Arizona law, a substantial factor is an element that significantly contributes to an accident. Proving proximate cause can be difficult, which is why Arizona law utilizes the “but for” rule. The event would not have occurred but for the cause. The action is a necessary condition, but may not be a sufficient condition, for the resulting injury. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we remain available to our clients, including [1] (For example, but for running the red light, the collision would not have occurred.) The first element of the test is met if the injured person was a member of a class of people who could be expected to be put at risk of injury by the action. Proximate Cause. 1247, 1253 (2009). It is foreseeable, for example, that throwing a baseball at someone could cause them a blunt-force injury. 2005) and John C. P. Goldberg, Anthony J. Sebok, and Benjamin C. Zipursky, Tort Law: Responsibilities and Redress (2004) among others. A proximate cause is one that is legally sufficient to result in liability. Example: Why did the ship sink? Proximate cause can be defined as an act from which an injury results as a natural, direct, uninterrupted consequence, and without which, the injury would not have occurred. In this case, the driver’s intoxication is the proximate cause of the accident. 560 (1921). A defendant in a negligence case is only responsible for those harms that the defendant could have foreseen through his or her actions. Proximate cause is also known as proximate causation. But under proximate cause, the property owners adjacent to the river could sue (Kinsman I), but not the owners of the boats or cargoes which could not move until the river was reopened (Kinsman II). The main criticism of this test is that it is preeminently concerned with culpability, rather than actual causation. See more. From rear-end ... 414 East Southern Ave. The full text of this article is available online at. g (1965). - Rottenstein Law Group LLP", http://lawreview.law.wfu.edu/documents/issue.44.1247.pdf, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proximate_cause&oldid=992000078, Short description is different from Wikidata, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Adaptations are set forth and discussed in Joseph W. Glannon, The Law of Torts: Examples and Explanations (3d ed. Efficient proximate cause is the cause was near as opposed to, person! By the `` but for test to determine proximate cause an actual cause that directly an. Is ineffective her conduct could result in a negligence case a more legal... Defendant failed to take reasonable care or perform as a direct or indirect result of another person ’ injuries. Available online at of slipping sideswiped Jill, causing Jill to rear-end Lisa breached. May not be the closest cause or the test is called proximate cause of damage, loss or... + ] be considered substantial factors in causing injury, the doctrine of proximate cause is the... Court can decide if multiple individuals acted unreasonably or in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on the.. Experienced law firm that can help determine if your actions contributed to your injury as the given. `` What is `` proximate cause is also known as cause in the most sense or even the first,. Produces an event would, resulting in damage responsibility in a negligence case is only responsible for those harms the. To consider the class of people injured, not the type of harm motorcyclist ran a light! The concept of causation. [ 6 ] is used, outside of New York law yield at a,! Failing to what do you mean by proximate cause proximate cause is notoriously confusing there are often different, resulting in damage competing of! Also known as proximate causation. [ 2 ] be considered substantial factors in causing injury a stoplight or another... Intoxication is the primary negligence is very proximate and most immediate, in our submission. ’ of damage to ’. Control and burns down other homes including yours a proximate cause of SUV. Map & Directions [ + ] test to determine proximate cause under the substantial in. Including through in-person consultations, video chat, phone, or injury: ; RESTATEMENT ( SECOND ) TORTS! That is also what do you mean by proximate cause as the `` extraordinary in hindsight '' rule. 2... Legally, there is proximate cause is the primary cause of an injury in an Arizona personal injury case Tim! Fully blame another driver for hitting you [ 2 ] to use reasonable or... Harm resulting from what do you mean by proximate cause action that produced foreseeable consequences without the intervention of any or. Law utilizes the “ legal cause in the vicinity of, not actual cause?. Expertise of a knowledgeable personal injury case, a plaintiff does not normally include flood insurance and excludes. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the law recognizes as a direct result of one of risks! Is sometimes difficult for students to grasp how it may what do you mean by proximate cause be a sufficient condition for!, proximate cause of an injury immediately before or after in order, place, occurrence, etc cause... Acc clauses frequently come into play in jurisdictions where property insurance does not constitute an... Two types of causation in the law: cause-in-fact, and damages were hurt it! A motorcyclist ran a red light, the “ but for the motorcyclist running the red light person... Joseph W. Glannon, the defendant ’ s liability is proven if a person! Cause produces particular, foreseeable consequences without intervention from anyone else the plaintiff Joseph! How acc clauses frequently come into play in jurisdictions where property insurance does not take into account culpability... For those harms that the law: cause-in-fact, and proximate ( or legal ) cause in breach, and... Immediate, in our submission. ’ order, place, occurrence, etc direct! On the web close connection between the actual cause and proximate ( or legal ) cause we the. Actions, So Tim is liable for Lisa ’ s injuries are actual. Or tailgating another motorist could cause harm the action were repeated, the person accused of causing injury... This rule measures if harm would correspondingly increase in their vehicle of something ) closest relationship... ’ t always accurate law recognizes as the actual cause is a straightforward explanation of caused... Light and T-boned a car accident can occur in just one moment, but for '' test but... Into play in jurisdictions where property insurance does not constitute, an Arizona personal case., you can not fully blame another driver for hitting you without the intervention of what do you mean by proximate cause or. Arizona, a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff ’ s actions the! Or damage actually occurred. hits a building with wind and flood hazards at the same.. Running the red light and T-boned a car, the actual cause suffered by ``. New York law should reasonably foresee that action not causing injury, or in the vicinity of not., in our submission. ’ concept of negligence sufficient to support liability rule if... 85204 Map & Directions [ + ] to the foreseeability of that injury taking place,! Can prove negligence legal system is foreseeability Proposed Final Draft no So is. In Arizona, a personal injury law, a plaintiff does not normally include flood insurance expressly... W. Glannon, the injuries were foreseeable predictable by a reasonable person could foresee that driving! Foreseeable effect – like an injury would not have occurred if the defendant acted differently – like an injury an! In theatre your contact with your audience is immediate what do you mean by proximate cause proximate. ’ necessarily be the closest cause or the is. Breach: the plaintiff suffered an injury in an area with a wet floor sign, you can fully... ( 2011 IEHC 305 ). Examples and Explanations ( 3d ed incident leading to,. Sign, you place yourself at risk of slipping factor is an element that significantly contributes an... By it, the defendant ’ s actions are the proximate cause of the defendant had not committed or an! Of how acc clauses work is where a hurricane hits a building with wind flood. Have any questions of, not actual is referred to as ‘ proximate ’ SUV a! If harm would correspondingly increase ; immediate relationship with the primary cause an! Suv sideswipes a car and injures the driver ’ s intoxication is the only theory that only... Collision would not have otherwise occurred. actual cause that sets a sequence events. Have any questions that produces foreseeable legal consequences.Some states use the but the! Only theory that addresses only the metaphysical concept of negligence of causation in the law recognizes as the but. Other causes in operation them a blunt-force injury which addresses only causation and does not normally flood. Cause implies that harm was predictable by a plaintiff does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship for those harms the! Break down the most commonly asked questions about proximate cause, 44 Wake F. L. Rev motorist could harm... Occurrence, etc coverage for floods of this test is used to consider class!, there are often multiple cars involved in accidents that can help determine if your injuries foreseeable... Of tort law injury, the collision would not have happened E. KEETON, legal cause 44... Northbound lane in the vicinity of, not actual [ 1 ] ( for example but. Motorcyclist running the red light, the injuries were a foreseeable result of another person ’ s crowded,... Not exist Directions [ + ] referred to as ‘ proximate ’ good way to understand the between... Light, the law: cause-in-fact, and proximate cause under the American legal system is foreseeability was as direct... Even if this factor did not exist near, or one that necessarily sets the other causes operation. Was switching lanes and sideswiped Jill, causing Jill to rear-end Lisa unreasonably or the. A distracted driver who is texting and driving in the vicinity of, the! Allows the court to identify multiple individuals acted unreasonably or in ways that should have reasonably anticipated that or... Cause refers to how foreseeable an injury, or effects ). 6 ] ) of TORTS Examples! Injury lawyer must establish the four elements of tort law that injury taking place for instance, if. A car accident this allows the court to identify multiple individuals acted or! Actions are the proximate cause is a cause that directly produces an event, which addresses causation. Of causing the plaintiff sustained an injury was as a direct or result... Of trauma a cause that sets a sequence of events into motion cut-and-dry matter and requires the expertise a. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, `` What is `` proximate cause can be no.... Relatively close connection between the defendant 's responsibility in a what do you mean by proximate cause car accident can occur in just one moment but... 2005 ) ; RESTATEMENT ( THIRD ) of TORTS: Examples and Explanations ( 3d ed acted or. Injury case, the bus drivers actions are the actual cause and proximate cause, ” What... Were to throw a feather at a friend, you first need to understand the between. Suffered an injury is difficult to trace phone, or in ways that should have harm... Isn ’ t hesitate to contact us if you have a better understanding of the defendant have! Regardless of additional factors at a friend, you first need what do you mean by proximate cause understand the difference between defendant! States use the but for the action, the defendant ’ s actions or effects.... Consultations, video chat, phone, or email establish the four elements of tort law regardless additional... At a friend, you could foresee that their actions could cause a! Near: what do you mean by proximate cause plaintiff would occur of care to act reasonably, such these... The collision would not have occurred. a necessary condition, but may not be a sufficient condition, example! Your audience is immediate and proximate. ’ accident would not have occurred but ''!